David Cameron’s Muscular Liberalism

The phrase David Cameron launched yesterday – ‘muscular liberalism’ – makes my mind (generally undisturbed by thoughts of any kind) boggle with possibilities. I begin to wonder what he and Nick Clegg talk about in the gym while pumping iron (‘Spot me, Nicko, how’s this for liberal muscle?’) or pumping funding out of the NHS (‘No pain no gain, Nicko’).

I also wonder at the wisdom of Cameron choosing to air his perceptions of the shortcomings of ‘state multiculturalism’, on the very day when members of the ultra-right wing English Defence League have been causing a policing bill for £800,000 in Luton.

I suppose the timing meant Cameron got more time on the news bulletins and space in the Sunday papers on the backs of a bunch of right wing extremists parading around polluting the St George’s flag. But in doing so he gave a form of legitimacy to the EDL marchers by singling out the very people they hold up for hatred – Muslims.

Listening to what Cameron actually said, e.g. that Britain needs ‘a lot less of the passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism’, it sounded at first like a combination of Big Society hot air as well as another attempt to dress the ‘respectable’ right (Tories, Lib Dems) in the clothes of the progressive left, whilst justifying cutting government funding to community cohesion projects. A way of looking progressive without doing anything progressive – in fact doing the opposite.

His stance on Islam and Islamism is clumsy and shows a politician out of touch. Stating the blindingly obvious, he said ‘someone can be a devout Muslim and not be an extremist’. Yes. Just as someone can be a Tory and not be a complete idiot. The fact he feels the need to state the obvious seems to imply he doesn’t really know the distinction, or is uneasy in his argument.

He also said ‘we need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing’. Thanks, Mr Cameron.

He went on to state his list of British values. ‘Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship. Democracy. The rule of law. Equal rights, regardless of race, sex or sexuality’. Nothing to argue with there.

Or is there? The speech has prompted a deal of criticism: in the context of a speech about the failure of state multiculturalism Cameron implies certain communities are not subscribing to his list of values. He offers the list during a speech in which he seems to be pondering in his own mind the difference between Islam and Islamist extremism.

I think there is of course a debate to had about community, race and religious relations in this country. But in the context of Luton, and the content of his speech, David Cameron has today shown, for all his talk of muscular liberalism, that he does not possess the strengths, instincts or judgement to lead it.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Politics

One response to “David Cameron’s Muscular Liberalism

  1. ecks why

    the success of multiculturalism requires that all parties involved show some tolerance for each other. islam does not meet this requirement and is dangerous no matter how it is packaged.

    muslims do not assimilate into western society because islam is a theocracy and demands supremacy. there is no radical, moderate, hijacked or any other nuanced semanticism type of islam. there is only islam which is based on the life of a murdering 8th century warlord.

    the twin fogs of political correctness & ignorance must be dispersed before western society better understands this menace. even a brief review of islamic theology & history quickly exposes the deadly roots of this evil ideology.

    see the links in the pdf version below for more accurate info about islam
    ==========

    islam is a horrible ideology for human rights

    5 key things about islam

    1. mythical beliefs – all religions have these (faith) because its part of being a religion: having beliefs without proof until after the believer dies. the problem is people will believe almost anything.

    2. totalitarianism – islam has no seperation of church and state: sharia law governs all. there is no free will in islam: only submission to the will of allah as conveniently determined by the imams who spew vapors to feather their own nests. there are no moderate muslims: they all support sharia law.

    3. violence – islam leads the pack of all religions in violent tenets for their ideology & history: having eternal canonical imperatives for supremacy at all costs and calling for violence & intimidation as basic tools to achieve these goals.

    4. dishonesty – only islam has dishonesty as a fundamental tenet: this stems from allah speaking to mohamhead & abrogation in the koran which is used to explain how mo’s peaceful early life was superseded by his warlord role later.

    5. misogyny – present day islam is still rooted in 8th century social ethics: treating females as property of men good only for children, severely limiting their activities, dressing them in shower curtains and worse.

    conclusions ??

    there really are NO redeeming qualities for this muddled pile of propaganda.

    islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.

    graphics version

    1 page pdf version – do file/download 6kb viewer doesn’t show fonts well, has better fonts header footer links, great for emailing printing etc
    http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B_UyNP-72AVKYWNiNTFlYTEtMTA1ZC00YjhiLTljMDUtMDhhNDE0NDMzNmYz

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s